2024 Reject reviewer comments

Reject reviewer comments

Author: sucb

August undefined, 2024

WebComments to Editors and Authors. The editor not only uses reviewer comments to help make a decision. They will often refer to them in their decision letter. With this in mind, it’s helpful to editors if you: Number your comments. Are clear about which points are absolutely critical if the paper is given an opportunity for revision. WebApr 20, 2024 · It would at least show that you have made an effort to address the comment. However, if you cannot think of anything at all, I think it would be best to be honest about it. You can say that while you agree with the reviewer's suggestion, you have not been able to come up with any question. Hopefully, if you have addressed all the other comments ...

How to reject one reviewer

WebI would recommend the rejection of a manuscript based on the following: 1. The work lacks scientific merit - the manuscript does not make any significant improvement to the … WebReason 1: The suggested change would require you to conduct new research. Example reviewer's comment: "Your results are interesting, but I'd like to know what would happen if you had studied the effect on adolescents, in addition to adults." Phrases you can use: "follow-up study," "future research/consideration," "new direction," "outside the ... inchworm target muscles

How to respond to a reviewer comment that we cannot address?

WebApr 5, 2024 · Point 1: [Quote the reviewer’s comment] Response 1: [Address point 1 and say what revisions you’ve made to the paper] Point 2: [Quote the reviewer’s comment] Response 2: [Address point 2 and say what revisions you’ve made to the paper] Then repeat this for all comments by all reviewers! WebA ‘reject’ verdict means that a manuscript is not considered suitable to be published in an academic journal. Out of all editorial decisions, a ‘reject decision’ on a manuscript is the … WebJul 30, 2024 · The core problem is that I am worried that, after resubmission, the editors might decide "reject" for my paper, based upon the non-sense comments of Reviewer #2. That would be terrible to me. I am considering to write an email to the editor and ask him politely to ignore the unprofessional indications of Reviewer #2, and why. incomplete combustion of heptane equation

Review and comment on pull requests - Azure Repos

Trudeau says premiers

WebJan 16, 2024 · Wait for author: asks the author to review the reviewer comments. The PR author should let the reviewers know to re-review the code after the PR author has … WebThe decision depends on the editor's judgment of the quality of the article given the quality and policy of the journal. Some quality journals reject an article even when two or more … inchworm tattooWebOct 17, 2013 · Don’ts. Don’t argue every single comment. If the reviewer has suggested a minor revision that you might not entirely agree with, but is easy to comply with and does … incomplete comparison meaning

"WebMoreover, an example of cover letter that can go with your response to reviewers' comments is provided. Discover the world's research. 20+ million members; 135+ million publication … " - Reject reviewer comments

Reject reviewer comments

As a Peer Reviewer: When you should say Rejected …

WebIf the editor sent specific instructions for the reviewer report, or a form to fill out as part of the review, you should write your report in the requested format. ... or to reject the paper. … WebAug 9, 2024 · You can choose to appeal against the editorial decision. Since reviewer comments are in your favor, you might be able to build a compelling case. However, be aware that most of the time, appeals are not successful and might lead to further waste of time. So, if you are running short of time, it might be better to submit your paper to …

Did you know?

WebSep 9, 2014 · It is very important to incorporate the peer review comments into your paper, even if it has been rejected. This is because: 1. The peer review comments will help … On the Review tab, go to Comments and select Delete. See more

WebJan 19, 2024 · The accept/reject decision is made by the editor, based on the recommendations of the referee(s). In this case, the editor felt that the referee's opinion of unsuitability, even without any explanation, was sufficient to reject. Maybe the editor felt that the unsuitability was self-evident upon inspection. WebAug 31, 2024 · Recently I received a rejection letter from a journal editor (including some comments). However, when I checked the reviewers comments (from two reviewers), I …

WebIf the editor sent specific instructions for the reviewer report, or a form to fill out as part of the review, you should write your report in the requested format. ... or to reject the paper. Comments for both the editor and authors: In this section, write a detailed report reviewing the different parts of the manuscript. WebMoreover, an example of cover letter that can go with your response to reviewers' comments is provided. Discover the world's research. 20+ million members; 135+ million publication pages;

WebOct 7, 2024 · The standard Terms are 'Reject Pre Review and Suggest Transfer' and 'Reject Post Review and Suggest Transfer' but journals can customize. The main difference is in the wording of the decision letter, 'Pre-Review' does not mention reviewer comments. Complete the decision form as described in How do I make a decision in Editorial Manager?

WebComments from ethics reviewers will be considered by the primary reviewers and AC as part of their deliberation. They will also be visible to authors, who will have an opportunity to respond. Ethics reviewers do not have the authority to reject papers, but in extreme cases papers may be rejected by the program chairs on ethical grounds, regardless of scientific … inchworm teaching pointsWebSep 27, 2013 · In the case where more than one referee has raised the same concern, it’s best to cite “see response to point 2 from Reviewer #1”, for example. Do remember that each reviewer sees all comments and your replies so be equally respectful to all. The DON’Ts: Don’t vent or accuse the reviewers of bias or incompetence. incomplete credit applicationWeb2. Prepare a document of response. Think about every comment and how you wish to respond. When writing your responses, be clear, concise and use evidence to show your changes or reasons why you have dealt with the comments in a particular way. 3. Respond to every comment and suggested change, one by one. incomplete cross-modal subspace clusteringWebJun 13, 2024 · Reviewer consensus is valuable—only rarely are unanimous assessments overruled—but it is not mandatory. ACs make initial accept/reject recommendations with SACs: Thursday, Aug 26 – Thursday, September 2, 2024. During this period, ACs will be making initial recommendations for each paper. incomplete combustion of methanolWebMost journals give reviewers the option to provide some confidential comments to editors. Often this is where editors will want reviewers to state their recommendation - see the … inchworm techniqueWebSep 30, 2014 · Related Infographic. 8 Reasons why journals reject manuscripts. Rejection is the norm in scientific publishing. But by…. 7.7k. Such errors can make the peer reviewers … incomplete combustion of fossil fuel givesWebStay calm. Ask your supervisor or a colleague to look over the reviewer comments to see what they think. It will help you to determine whether your assessment of the review is correct. Email the editor and explain your challenge with the reviewer’s comments. Don’t let your emotions get the best of you. incomplete constrained motion