WebIn Holmes v Jones (1907) 4 CLR 1692 @ 1702 Griffith C. said: "It appears to me to be common sense as well as law that, when a purchaser chooses to rely upon his own judgment or upon that of his agent, he cannot afterwards say that he relied upon a previous representation made by the vendor." WebHolmes v Jones (1907) 4 CLR 1692. This case considered the issue of misrepresentation and whether or not a misrepresentation regarding the cattle numbers on a property was …
The Legal Case - Sites@GeorgiaTech
WebJan 9, 2003 · Holmes v. Jones United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana Jan 9, 2003 CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-1509, SECTION "K" (6) (E.D. La. Jan. 9, 2003)Copy Citation Download PDF Check Treatment Opinion CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-1509, SECTION "K" (6) January 9, 2003 ORDER AND REASONS STANWOOD R. DUVAL, JR., United States … WebANDREWS, Ch. J. The primary purpose of the article published in The New York Times November 26, 1886, containing the defamatory matter for which the action was brought, … bob family fortunes
Kern Cnty. Dep
Web• Holmes v Jones • Where the representee entered into the contract to purchase a rural property after finding out that the statements made as to the number of stock were false. • No misrepresentation had occurred. Author: Stephanie Created Date: WebHolmes v Jones (1907) 4 CLR 1692 This case considered the issue of misrepresentation and whether or not a misrepresentation regarding the cattle numbers on a property was fraudulent and whether or not this alleged fraudulent misrepresentation induced a person to purchase the property. Share this case study Like this case study Tweet WebPlaintiff Roland Holmes (Holmes) named Bill Jones, Secretary of State of the State of California, and Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General of the State of California, as … clip art for openoffice free