Glanston house v inag case 1977 2 sa 846
Web1977 (2) SA p978 (Pty.) Ltd. v Oranjegezicht Citrus Estates (Pty.) Ltd., supra.In any event, there was sufficient evidence to establish that the fair market value of the merx at the time of the sale was the sum of R22 000 less the cost of repairing the swimming pool. See also the authorities to the A effect that, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, it would be … WebIn the case of Gunasekera v. Minister of Lands & Agriculture and Others (,)H. N. G. Fernando, J. (as he then was ) held at page 120 as follows:-“The consequence of the …
Glanston house v inag case 1977 2 sa 846
Did you know?
WebCORE – Aggregating the world’s open access research papers WebJohn buys Zinziwes television set for R5 000 During the negotiations John tells from LAW LPL4801 at University of South Africa
http://www.saflii.org/za/journals/DEJURE/2012/30.pdf Web[1] The primary question in this appeal is whether on the facts of this case the loss of prospective profits is compensable in law as delictual damages. [2] Transnet Limited (the appellant), a parastatal corporation, called for public tenders for the purchase of one of its divisions, Transnet Production House, which operated a printing business.
WebHarvey Greenacre & Co Ltd 1962 3 SA 767 (D), Glaston House (Pty) Ltd v Inag (Pty) Ltd 1977 2 SA 846 (A). 12 De Wet & Van Wyk 330. 13 Kerr 108 n 22 states that the case of … Web1 glaston house pty ltd v inag pty ltd 1977 2 sa 846 School University of South Africa Course Title LAW LPL4801 Uploaded By BRAPATZ Pages 38 Ratings 100% (3) This preview shows page 29 - 32 out of 38 pages. View full document Document preview View questions only See Page 1
WebDikoko v Mokhatla 2006(6) SA 235 (CC) - This was a defamation case, which involved two public figures - an executive mayor and the chief executive officer (CEO) of the same municipality. Ubuntu played an important part in the reasoning of the Court on the merits of the case and in the Court eventually reducing the quantum of the damages ... health and life networking llchttp://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAGPPHC/2015/835.rtf golf hemmingford rabaisWebIn Glaston House (Pty) Ltd v Inag (Pty) Ltd 1977 2 SA 846 (A) the plaintiff succeeded on the basis of fraudulent misrepresentation (see the majority decision of the case onpage 872, especially at paragraphs A-D). Therefore, the other options are incorrect. (1) QUESTION 5 The correct answer is (1). health and life organization rancho cordovaWeba) The object for damages differ depending on whether a plaintiff is suing on the basis of a contract or delict. In Glaston House (Pty) Ltd v Inag Pty (Ltd) 1 the court held that 1 Glaston House (Pty) Ltd v Inag (Pty) Ltd 1977 (2) SA 846. health and life rotenturmstraßeWebSouthern African Legal Information Institute golf henley shirtWebOther diverse encumbrances related to immovable property are also regarded as latent defects in our case law. 2 The defect must not be insignificant. ... (Glaston House (Pty) Ltd v Inag (Pty) Ltd 1977 (2) SA 846 (A)). The seller is also liable for misrepresentation if he deliberately conceals poor qualities which, though admittedly not latent ... health and life pty ltdWebAdditional: [37] Par Excellence Colour Printing (Pty) Ltd v Ronnie Cox Graphic Supplies (Pty) ltd 1983 1 SA 295 (A); [50] Glaston house (Pty) Ltd v Inag (Pty) ltd 1977 2 SA 846 (A); Barnard J “The influence of the CPA 68 of 2008 on the common law warranty against eviction: a comparative overview” (2012) 15 PELJ 347-376 1.7 Warranty against Latent ... health and life safety